|
Recent Features
Categories
|
Changing expecations (again)January 02, 2006 • Categories: Books, movies and reading ... , Social networking , User experience
First, somebody was showing me the Irish Playography site, an impressive accounting of Irish plays and the people involved with them, and, at first sight, a useful resource for those who want to find out more in this area.
As I browsed each, I was struck that I kept looking for the user-contributed content. The comments by play-goers, readers, people who reported additional details or perceptions about the people and activities being presented. This was, for me, another example of how a particular kind of offering - in this case sites which solicit user-contributed content - is creating a general expectation. Without user-contributed content, each of these sites seemed - to me anyway - slightly flat or inert. This is probably unfair to the creators of the sites, but it is how I responded. And I certainly wouldn't have felt this way a couple of years ago. Of course, this may have had something to do with having spent quite a while looking up movies in various places over the holiday period! Incidentally, I liked the quote that the British Council site had gleaned from the modest Paul Muldoon: I'm afraid I can't come up with anything wonderfully witty and wise to say about my work, except to wish that it displayed a shade more wit or wisdom. [Paul Muldoon. British Council.] Related entry: |
Colleagues
Book Reviews
Journals & Magazines
Find In A Library
|
3 comments so far
We're proposing to add user ratings and comments to LII in the next grant cycle... I may quote your blog!
A question for pondering, not necessarily answering: How do those of us in the digital-preservation business expand our writ to cover user feedback?
I'd sure love to add interaction to my IR, but I don't see how I can justify it to the people it'd take to make it happen.
I think that there is an interesting issue of scale here. As we know, contributors need to be incented to participate. And a part of that incentive relates to the centrality/visibility/importance of the resource being contributed to.
For that reason, I don't think that user contribution will work in many settings in which it is currently being discussed.