The decision by the New York Times to open up for general reading the formerly for-fee TimeSelect parts of its website is being widely discussed. The rationale given is interesting.

Since we launched TimesSelect in 2005, the online landscape has altered significantly. Readers increasingly find news through search, as well as through social networks, blogs and other online sources. In light of this shift, we believe offering unfettered access to New York Times reporting and analysis best serves the interest of our readers, our brand and the long-term vitality of our journalism. We encourage everyone to read our news and opinion – as well as share it, link to it and comment on it. [A Letter to Readers About TimesSelect - New York Times]

This is another indication that discovery happens elsewhere. The material is currently not available to people who come to the website, but more importantly it is not available for crawling, linking, quoting, commenting. It is not open to the web. The website is not the focus of a user's attention: the web is, and for material to be discoverable it must be open to the ways in which web users discover and share materials .... elsewhere.

Incidentally, I was struck by the comment that the online landscape has changed significantly in two years. That's two years!

Related entry:

Comments: 2

Sep 19, 2007
Ed Jones

I'm surprised content aggregators haven't felt the need to move in this direction. According to a Jan. 2006 report in the New England Journal of Medicine, "In June 2005, Google provided the majority (56.4 percent) of the referrals from search engines to articles in HighWire-hosted journals ... PubMed accounted for 8.7 percent, Google Scholar 3.7 percent, and Yahoo 3.4 percent. Google Scholar has been available only since late 2004, and many people remain unaware of it. ... In the past, searching has often started with PubMed ... The number of searches performed with PubMed has increased steadily to about 70 million per month ... Yet at the same time, an increasing number of people are finding their way to citations and abstracts in PubMed through searches that begin with Google..." http://content.nejm.org/cgi/content/full/354/1/4

Sep 19, 2007
bowerbird

> I was struck by the comment that
> the online landscape has changed
> significantly in two years.
> That's two years!

you shouldn't believe everything you read.

even in the new york times.

the "change" happened a longer time ago.

> http://www.kottke.org/remainder/07/09/14125.html

-bowerbird