Lorcan Dempsey's weblog On libraries, services and networks.   

Dis-owning collections

 •  Categories: Identity management, IPR and e-commerce , ebooks and other e-resources

It is now conventional to make a distinction between what libraries own (e.g. books, DVDs, ...) and what they license (e.g. e-journals).

However, we can only use 'own' in a circumscribed way. This has been made clearer in the mass digitization projects. Libraries cannot do as they wish with the digitized copies of copyrighted material. And we know that in most library collections, a large part, maybe a majority part, is still covered by copyright.

What the library in fact 'owns' is the cost of managing the physical materials and of making them available to users. They do not 'own' the content, and are limited in what they can do with it.

In fact, they may end up licensing the very content that they thought they owned once it has been digitized.

Bookmark:  del.icio.us   Digg This   Google Boomarks   reddit   Furl  

3 comments so far

Posted by...Posted by Lizanne Payne on October 8, 2007

The combination of the first sale doctrine and the inherent limitations of a physical medium means that libraries are, in effect, organized to make each physical item available to a "single simultaneous user". As the boundaries between physical collections and digital collections blur even further in the context of the mass digitization projects, perhaps academic libraries (and their institutions) will perform more critical analyses of the costs of housing individual physical collections and may become more open to the possibility of a collective approach.

Posted by...Posted by Tony Ferguson on October 8, 2007

You indicate "What the library in fact 'owns' is the cost of managing the physical materials and of making them available to users." While this negative honour may be true, don't libraries own the "presentation" of that content -- or is it even that? If library X contributes the content of a 1920 book to the world via Google and my library downloads it and puts it on my own server -- has my library broken any laws?

Posted by...Posted by Lorcan Dempsey on October 8, 2007

Tony - I should have been clearer. I was really referring to re-use of the materials which are still in copyright. Lorcan

Post a commentPost a comment

Remember me? 
(You may use HTML tags for style)
  
Syndication
AddThis Feed Button Atom Feed RSS Feed 1.0 RSS Feed 2.0
email.gif Weekly digest Enter email for digest
Find In A Library
Search for an item in libraries near you: