Lorcan Dempsey's weblog On libraries, services and networks.   

Reading ... or not?

 •  Categories: Books, movies and reading ...

Is listening to an audiobook 'reading'?

I remember asking this question at a conference last year and getting some diversity of response.

Like many others, our children's school uses Accelerated Reader. They can do the quizzes on books that they hear in the car as well as on those that they read.

Bookmark:  del.icio.us   Digg This   Google Boomarks   reddit   Furl  

5 comments so far

Posted by...Posted by Martin on November 29, 2007

That's a really interesting question isn't it? I was asking myself that the other day after listening to Ian McEwan's On Chesil Beach during a long flight, can I say I've read it? It depends if it's abridged or not for a start, but let's say it's unabridged, is there something in the act of reading itself that makes a difference? I once argued (pretentiously) that reading was a 'cognitive' art form since it wasn't tied to one sense. Blind readers who use braille for instance would argue that they are reading as much as anyone else. So, I think the answer's yes, it is reading, but there is a slight difference to its nature.

Posted by...Posted by Karen Tobin on November 29, 2007

Yes, but only if it's unabridged.

Posted by...Posted by Gem on November 29, 2007

I don't believe listening to an audiobook is reading. However, I believe that listening to an audiobook is as valid as reading. If I belonged to a book club, I wouldn't feel any hesitation over listening to a book instead of reading it. The experience may be a little different. For instance, I dislike reading first person narrative but listening to first person is fine. I've also discovered that some genres I prefer to listen to and some I prefer to read.

Posted by...Posted by Kurt on November 29, 2007

Is listening to a song 'singing'?

Is hearing a sermon 'preaching'?

Is looking at a watercolor 'painting'?

Is viewing a map 'traveling'?

Or are those surrogate experiences different in kind from listening to an audiobook?

Posted by...Posted by scott wicks on November 30, 2007

Well...in human terms, reading involves use of the eyes to ingest visual content, so listening to an audio book would not be considered reading.

One could say "I processed that book" meaning she ingested the content, but that's still too general and could be construed as anything from cataloging to labeling to discharging a book.

For those who like to verberize their nouns, how about taking the noun 'content' and making it a verb? I contented that book could mean I listened to it or I read it or I ate it, but somehow I took the content and ingested it.

Post a commentPost a comment

Remember me? 
(You may use HTML tags for style)
  
Syndication
AddThis Feed Button Atom Feed RSS Feed 1.0 RSS Feed 2.0
email.gif Weekly digest Enter email for digest
Find In A Library
Search for an item in libraries near you: